You are here: Home / B to L Cat / Judeo/Christian god does not exist / God is Logically Impossible The Argument for Atheism from Incoherence – Vexen Crabtree  

God is Logically Impossible The Argument for Atheism from Incoherence – Vexen Crabtree  

by 333 Comments

There is no direct evidence that any god(s) exist. Likewise, there are no purely theoretical arguments that prove any gods either1. In addition to the lack of reasons for a God’s existence, the Argument from Incoherence holds that the very concept of god is self-contradictory and impossible, therefore, theism is false and atheism is true. Omnipotence and omniscience contradict free will and themselves are logically impossible; its omniscience is impossible for it to validate and there are questions about its own being that it itself cannot answer (therefore, nothing can be omniscient). If it is a perfect being, then, there is no need to do any creating. If it is eternal and immutable, then its very thoughts are eternal and immutable – in other words, it has no mental states. If its basic emotional, behavioural and instinctive drives are all fixed (i.e., not created by itself, therefore, not under its own control, and unchanging), then it is hard to imagine how the being, existing in a world without stimulation nor change, can be conscious at all. Without free will, morality, omniscience the remaining “god” is only an automaton: a being that follows necessity and logic. But the concept of a creator god is even more problematic – for this ‘creator of everything’ must have inherent traits that it itself did not create. It must be intelligent and rational (therefore, it can’t have created intelligence nor logic). It must have desire, drives, motivations, an amazing omniscient thinking mechanism, and it can’t have created itself. So it seems impossible and untrue to say that “everything must have a cause, therefore there is a god”. Each property of god is itself a contradiction of the idea that god is the sole creator. All those uncreated self-traits lead to an impossibly unlikely situation where a complicated and multi-faceted being is invoked in order to explain a Universe that is said to be too complex to have self-created. The very concept of a creator god contradicts itself, and is impossible and incoherent. The First Cause of everything is not a god at all, it is merely the natural laws of an atheistic universe.

  1. God Cannot Have Free Will
  2. God Cannot Be All-Knowing (Omniscient)
  3. God Cannot Be All-Powerful (Omnipotent)
  4. God Cannot be Perfectly Benevolent or Morally Good
  5. The Immutable Creator of Time: Robotic, Emotionless and Unthinking
  6. The Features and Properties of God Were All Non-Created, Which Contradict the Idea of a God as the Sole Creator
  7. The Unwarranted Assumptions of Theism
  8. Links

1. God Cannot Have Free Will

#free_will #god

It is known by four strong arguments that God cannot have free will, as other features and properties of God contradict the possibly of god being able to make choices.

  1. An omniscient being cannot have free will because it is predestined by its own knowledge of its future actions.
  2. A perfectly benevolent God cannot have free will because there is only one perfect course of action, which God, being perfectly good, must follow.
  3. The creator of time cannot have free will: if God exists outside of time then it is immutable, unchanging, and as such it has no mental states except one everlasting and perfect state. Choices require changes in mental states over time. An eternal being that created time cannot have free will.
  4. If God created free will then it cannot itself already have had free will before it done so: yet, an omniscient being already knew (before it created free will) everything it would do. Therefore any creator-god cannot have free will about any of its actions.

See:

2. God Cannot Be All-Knowing (Omniscient)

2.1. How Can God Verify Its Own Creator-God Status?

If you knew everything, then you should know that you know everything. If you do not know if you know everything, then you don’t know everything. So, would a god know everything? How would it know? There are some questions that even a god could not answer. One question proceeds from a possible being that God could create. God could create a solipsistic being and make that being so that it thinks it created the universe. It could give such a being allknowledge except knowledge that it itself was created. Such a being would have no idea that it was, in fact, a created being and that there was another, higher, creator. If God wanted to create such a deluded being, it could do so. The problem is, our theorized God itself does not know if it exists in such a state of ignorance. In short, God cannot know if it does actually know everything. There is no way for it to even verify that it is indeed the true creator god.

2.2. How Can God Verify That Its Knowledge is Complete?

All intelligent sentient beings must realize that without verification from other beings than itself or from science, it cannot know if it is correct in its world view. It doesn’t matter how intelligent or knowledgeable a being is – if that being wants to verify its knowledge to make sure that it is correct then it needs to look to something more intelligent than itself, or to science. But what if you are the creator of science? You couldn’t then use your own construct to test if your own construct was true, it would be a circular and invalid test. If god attempted to find out if it did indeed know everything, it would realize that it has no way to know. How does it know it knows everything? It merely thinks it does. God has no test, method or possibility of finding out if it does indeed know everything. God could itself be a created being, with another creator hiding secretly behind it. It wouldn’t know. In short, it does not and cannot know if this is true. Also, what if God uses its power to intentionally forget something? For Christians, this is exactly what the Bible says God can do, in Isaiah 43:25. If an omniscient and omnipotent being has chosen not to know something, then it may, or may not, know that it doesn’t know. The worst possibility is when it erases its own knowledge of self-forgetting. It can therefore never know that it doesn’t know something. It can’t check. God does not know everything and is not omniscient. In fact, no being can know everything because no being, however creative or perfect, can verify that its own knowledge is complete.

2.3. Thinking Beings Do Not Know Their Own Substance

“I think therefore I am” is as true for God as it is for any being. But: God cannot account for its own nature. Whatever facet of personality, willpower or desire it examines about itself, it will find that it cannot find out why it is like it is. Whydoes God know everything? Why is god good-natured, or, creative, or loving? (If it indeed it is those things, of course). It seems that all-knowing is not an attainable state. Immanuel Kant says that it is impossible, through self-reflection, to know your own substance. He adds:

“For as he does not as it were create himself, and does not come by the conception of himself a priori but empirically, it naturally follows that he can obtain his knowledge even of himself only by the inner sense and, consequently, only through the appearances of his nature and the way in which his consciousness is affected.”

“Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals” by Immanuel Kant (1785)2

An omniscient being is in the same boat: it cannot self-verify. Gassendi came to the same conclusion, as reported by Voltaire:

“‘It is true,’ says Gassendi, ‘that you know what you think; but you are ignorant of what species of substance you are, you who think. Thus although the operation of thought is known to you, the principle of your essence is hidden from you; and you do not know what is the nature of this substance, one of the operations of which is to think.’”

“Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary” by Voltaire (1764)3

2.4. Potential Self-Willed Ignorance

Assume that God does know everything. For some reason god chooses not to know something. It erases something from its own knowledge, and, makes it so that it hasn’t known about it for all of time so it can’t simply look into a different time when it did know. It then removes its own memory of having intentionally forgotten something. I argue in “The Four Dimensions and the Immutability of God” by Vexen Crabtree (2007) that God can’t do such things. But I might be wrong, so here’s the clincher:

How would god know now if it had intentionally chosen not to know something? It wouldn’t be able to contradict its own will in choosing not to know, but if it destroyed the memory of making such a choice, it also wouldn’t know if it had actually forgotten anything. This is another (admittedly tenuous) class of self-knowledge that any being lacks and can never know. Without an answer to this potential source of agnosia, no being that aspires to omniscience can be truly omniscient.

For a fuller discussion of the place of omniscience in world religions, see “Is Omniscience Possible? Does God Know Everything?” by Vexen Crabtree (2002). Its page menu is:

  1. Is God All-Knowing in the Bible and Qur’an?
  2. An Omniscient Being Has No Free Will
  3. Epistemological Problems: No Being Can Be Omniscient
    1. How Can God Verify Its Own Creator-God Status?
    2. How Can God Verify That Its Knowledge is Complete?
    3. Thinking Beings Do Not Know Their Own Substance
    4. Potential Self-Willed Ignorance
  4. Contradictions from Scripture: When God Doesn’t Know All
    1. Christianity: Times in the Bible When God Doesn’t Know All, and Tests People to Find Things Out
    2. Islam: Times in the Qur’an When God Tests People to Find Things Out
  5. Hinduism 

3. God Cannot Be All-Powerful (Omnipotent)

#christianity #islam

Omnipotency is the power to do anything at all – “all-powerful”. In monotheistic religions such as Christianity and IslamGod is held to be all-powerful. It is hard to imagine that any omnipotent being could be anything other than a single monotheistic God. Omnipotency implies other super-powers because if you are all-powerful then you have the means to instantly uncover any and every fact, so it also infers omniscience. Not only that but, in order to have the ability to do anything, you need to know everything. You can’t change reality (for example, by making a cup appear out of thin air) without knowing the precise and accurate detail of how every atom and subatomic particle in a cup should be positioned and the detail of how every intrinsic force of nature works. Omnipotency and omniscience go together. Omnipotency requires omniscience.

Unfortunately, we saw above the omniscience has a number of epistemological problems. Omnipotency, too, is confined by too many exceptions and rules as to really describe a possible state. As omniscience and omnipotency give rise to each other, so are they also both equally impossible.

There are some commonly stated limitations to the very concept of omnipotency, meaning that some qualifications need to be made against the idea of an all-powerful God:

  1. Irrational and illogical actions such as creating a “round square” or making 2+2=5, appear to be impossible even for an all-powerful God. So many say that “all-powerful” means only the ability to do all logical non-contradictory actions.4
  2. Self-limiting actions such as making itself non-existent, or, removing its own power of omnipotency, are often said to be impossible for an all-powerful being. If it chose to make itself unable to do a particular action then it would be a simple gesture for this being to re-instate its power. For example, if the all-powerful God knows that in the year 2050 it will cause an Earthquake, but, in the year 2040 it removes its own power to cause natural disasters, it can of course do two things, (1) use its omnipotency to give itself the power again, or (2) in 2030 to jump ahead in time and do it before it removed its own ability. Also if such a being decides “I shall for all time not have the ability to do something”, then, it can only do that action if it does have the ability to do it. This self-negation causes an impossible time-continuum contradiction. It thusly seems impossible for it to stop itself from performing any action.
  3. There can only be one omnipotent being, otherwise, their two independent wills would limit each other’s power. By definition, both would have to “get their own way” all the time in order to continue to be all-powerful. In other words, they could never effectively disagree. Therefore there can only be one omnipotent being which means that any omnipotent being cannot create another omnipotent being – yet another thing than an “all-powerful” God cannot do!

Finally, the three most damning limitations:

  1. God Cannot be Responsible for Creating Logic Itself:In order to create, to think, God’s thoughts must be more than random. To create the universe and its laws, God must be able to think logically. If it can’t think logically, then, the laws of the universe were simply random, and the Universe might as well been self-created in an atheistic manner. In other words, for God to exist, God’s thoughts must have always been ordered in a logical manner otherwise God could never have created order from chaos.

    Book Cover

    Kepler, one of the great minds in the history of science, came to similar conclusions about geometry, but didn’t go as far as to say that it preceded God:

    “Geometry existed before the Creation. It is co-eternal with the mind of God… Geometry provided God with a model for the Creation… Geometry is God Himself.”

    Johannes Kepler
    In “Cosmos” by Carl Sagan (1995)<vccm_inssub=”kepler in=”” sagan=”” (1995)=”” p70.”–=””></vccm_inssub=”kepler>

    Kepler was assumedly counting mathematics and the general rules of the universe as ‘geometry’.

    This means that logic is a precursor to God. Logic, with its simple relations and rules that lets thought itself be ordered, must have existed independently of God’s creative power. God could not have created the logic because requires logical thoughts to do any meaningful creating. See: The Universe Could Not Have Been Created by God: The Failure of First Cause Arguments.

  2. An all-powerful god cannot be benevolent.Responsible for making every aspect of evil and suffering possible and for creating the long chain of cause and effect that results in disasters and influences people to choose wrongly, god is so absolutely responsible for all evil and pain that it renders it amoral at best, and at worst, immoral. See: The Problem of Evil: Why Would a Good God Create Suffering?.
  3. God contradicts free will. If a being is all-knowing, then, it knows exactly what actions it itself will make at any point in history. This removes the ability of the God to actually change its mind, alter the grand plan, or in other words, to exercise free will in any way, as the all-powerful and all-knowing being is guided purely by a deterministic fate based on infallible knowledge of its own future actions. Hence, many say that an all-knowing and all-powerful being cannot be a moral being and is probably an unconscious automaton (ergo, not divine). See: God Has No Free Will: 2 Proofs

These limitations on omnipotency have built up to form quite a list of things an all-powerful being cannot do. “All-powerful” can’t mean what it says in any simple way. Omnipotency is best not described as “the ability to do anything”, rather as “the ability to do the maximum number of possible actions within the confines of logical impossibilities and self-limitations, except the creation of other beings that are also super-powerful, but, this power cannot co-exist simultaneously with the power of omniscience (being all-knowing) and free will nor benevolence. Also, omnipotency depends upon the ability to think straight and therefore requires the pre-existence of logic; ergo an omnipotent being cannot be the reality-creating first cause of existence“.

The resultant being, if all-powerful, is the shallow wreckage of an amoral entity, bound by such severe limitations on agency that ultimate creative power, moral agency and free will are all removed. An omnipotent being is simply impossible – the closest thing that could exist is an amoral very-powerful automaton.

See Is God All-Powerful? Can God or Anything Truly Be Omnipotent?. The arguments above are taken from the first section on that page. Its menu is:

  1. Logical Limitations: An Omnipotent God is Impossible
  2. The Problem of Evil
  3. Can God Create a Rock So Heavy That It Can’t Lift It?
  4. Is God All-Powerful According to the Christian Bible and Qur’an?
  5. The Ineffectiveness of God to Answer Prayers
  6. A Powerful Being Can Easily Fool Us Into Thinking it is Omnipotent

4. God Cannot be Perfectly Benevolent or Morally Good

See:

That “God is Good” is a common assumption made by theists yet God could exist and be neutral (amoral) or malevolent (evil and immoral). But it cannot be “morally good”. It if it perfectly good then it always makes the most perfect choices and therefore has no free will. A being with no free will cannot be morally good as it makes no moral choices; it can only be morally neutral like a robot. Also, if God’s actions and wishes are automatically good by definition, then its morality is arbitrary and we ourselves have no moral reason to follow it, and may do so only out of fear of the consequences or of selfish want of reward. If God’s actions are not by definition good, then, there must be an independent source of the definition of goodness. If God has always been good then God can’t have been the creator of goodness; yet if it wasn’t, then what was? The idea of a good god causes contradictions. If you do not accept purely logical, philosophical or theological arguments that god cannot be benevolent, then, the real-world existence of evil and suffering (of babies, etc) is also evidence that the world was not created by a perfectly good god. Natural disasters such as earthquakes and volcanoes appear to be universal and not linked to Human free will, yet they cause much destruction. It seems that morality and God are contradictory. God cannot be the author of morality nor can it itself be moral.

5. The Immutable Creator of Time: Robotic, Emotionless and Unthinking

#christianity

This section is the conclusion from the fascinating “The Four Dimensions and the Immutability of God” by Vexen Crabtree (2007).

To be an eternal being that is responsible for creating the time of flow itself is to be immutable and unchanging. God has existed for all eternity before the creation of the world, and all of eternity after the demise of the world. The created world – from beginning to end – is like an object in the hands of God, that can be rotated and examined. God can view every timeline from start to finish, and knows the conclusion of every test. This First Cause of the Universe sits on the outside of time, looking it, effectively omniscient. But God is not subject to the laws of the Universe that it created. It holds all of time and space in its hands but it is not itself subject to time. For this reason, God doesn’t change. And for another reason, too: God is a perfect being. Any change away from a perfect state in order to achieve some aim or goal must be a step towards a good purpose: but, god, in being perfect, has already attained all good ends. God doesn’t consist of an eternal series of mental states: God is one mental state, perfect and eternal.

These conclusions have been reached by some of the leading historical Christian theologians. St Thomas Aquinas in the second book of his Summae Theologiae concludes that god cannot change itself, cannot be weary, or forget, or repent, or be angry or sad. It cannot undo the past, St Aquinas says, or make itself not exist. This is all because all these things are temporal events that require God to be subject to time itself; but as time is a dimension created by god, God is above and outside it.5

The result is that God is immeasurably cold and emotionless; much more like a robot than the God that many people wish exists. It seems the very concept of God verges on being self-contradictory: It is more of a principle, unconscious and non-thinking. These and other theological problems have led many to the conclusion that God simply doesn’t exist.

6. The Features and Properties of God Were All Non-Created, Which Contradict the Idea of a God as the Sole Creator

#atheism #theism

See: “The Universe Could Not Have Been Created by God: The Failure of First Cause Arguments” by Vexen Crabtree (2010).

If god created anything according to a thought-out logical plan, or, if God had a desire to create anything that wasn’t pure random chaos, then, god’s thoughts must have been framed around logic. This logic allowed god to think and create, and, gave motivation to God. Logic must have been the first cause; but if logic is a requirement for God and existed before God could create, then God cannot be the First Cause, and therefore, creator-god theism is false, and atheism is true.

We have seen how many of the properties of God contradict each other, and themselves turn out to be impossible. There is no possibility of any being existing with the properties that we would recognize as godly.

But the concept of a creator god is even more problematic – for this ‘creator of everything’ must have inherent traits that it itself did not create. It must be intelligent and rational (therefore, it can’t have created intelligence nor logic). It must have desire, drives, motivations, an amazing omniscient thinking mechanism, and it can’t have created itself. So it seems impossible and untrue to say that “everything must have a cause, therefore there is a god”. Each property of god is itself a contradiction of the idea that god is the sole creator. All those uncreated self-traits lead to an impossibly unlikely situation where a complicated and multi-faceted being is invoked in order to explain a Universe that is said to be too complex to have self-created. The very concept of a creator god contradicts itself, and is impossible and incoherent.

7. The Unwarranted Assumptions of Theism

#atheism #theism

An uncaused God is more complicated than an uncaused Big Bang. When it comes to comparing arguments where there is no hope of actually getting any physical evidence, there is a long-standing heuristic to help distinguish between theories, called Occam’s Razor: it turns out that when all evidence is accounted for, the theory with fewest assumptions is more likely to be true. God requires many properties and complexities such as consciousness, thought, personality, creative drive, love, an internal logic ordering its thoughts so that it can think coherently and rationally, memory, etc: All of these properties must have been derived from somewhere. It turns out that God is a vastly more complicated thing than the Big Bang and the fundamental laws of the Universe.

Theists and atheists both believe in some universal laws of logic and/or nature which exist as the first cause. But the theist position adds on a list of personality traits to this first cause, and, calls the result “God”. Whether these additional assumptions are warranted or not is hard to prove, hence why we say that the additional assumptions under theism are based on faith. These theistic assumptions include attributes about God: it is all-powerful, omniscient, benevolent, it has memory, it has rational and ordered thoughts running along logical lines, it is emotional, it wants to be worshipped and other particular assumptions of various religions. Even if it was found that the First Cause must be a conscious god, then, it is not reasonable to assume that all those other assumptions are true too. In comparison to all that, atheists make far fewer assumptions about reality, meaning that their position is more likely to be correct.

“The scientist, however, may wish to challenge the assumption that an infinite mind (God) is simpler than the universe. In our experience, mind only exists in physical systems that are above a certain threshold of complexity. […] While it is possible to imagine a disembodied mind, there must be some means of expression of the pattern, and the pattern itself is complex. So it could be argued that an infinite mind is infinitely complex and hence far less likely than a universe. […]

According to our best scientific understanding of the primeval universe it does indeed seem as though the universe began in the simplest state of all – thermodynamic equilibrium – and that the currently-observed complex structures and elaborate activity only appeared subsequently. It might then be argued that the primeval universe is, in fact, the simplest thing that we can imagine.”

“God And The New Physics” by Paul Davies (1984)6

The additional assumptions of theists are discussed on my page The Assumptions about God and Creation, of Both Theists and Atheists. Its list contains the following items – click on each for a discussion and some comments on the logical problems associated with them:

  1. God is Omniscient (All-Knowing)
  2. God is Omnipotent (All-Powerful)
  3. God is Perfectly Benevolent (Good)
  4. God Has Free Will
  5. God is Rational
  6. God is Conscious
  7. God Feels Emotions (Human Ones!)
  8. God Wants to be Worshipped
  9. God Communicates With Us
  10. God Cares What We Believe
  11. God Cares About Humankind in Particular
  12. God’s Existence Explains the Universe

Current edition: 2014 Jun 22
Last Modified: 2016 Nov 22
http://www.humanreligions.info/god_is_impossible.html
Parent page: There is No God: Theological, Philosophical and Logical Problems of Theism

Is God All-Powerful? Can God or Anything Truly Be Omnipotent?

God is Logically Impossible: The Argument for Atheism from Incoherence

The Characteristics of God:

Is God All-Powerful? Can God or Anything Truly Be Omnipotent?Is Omniscience Possible? Does God Know Everything?God and Goodness: Can a Perfectly Good God Exist? Is God Love?God Has No Free Will: 2 ProofsThe Assumptions about God and Creation, of Both Theists and AtheistsThe Four Dimensions and the Immutability of GodGod and Pronouns: God has No Gender

Links:

There is No God: Theological, Philosophical and Logical Problems of Theism

All #tags used on this page – click for more:

#atheism #christianity #free_will #god #islam #philosophy #religion #theism #theology

Social Media

References: (What’s this?)

Book Cover

Book Cover

Book Cover

Book Cover

The Bible (NIV). The NIV is the best translation for accuracy whilst maintaining readability. Multiple authors, a compendium of multiple previously published books. I prefer to take quotes from the NIV but where I quote the Bible en masse I must quote from the KJV because it is not copyrighted, whilst the NIV is. Book Review.

Davies, Paul
(1984) God And The New Physics. Paperback book. Penguin 2006 edition. Davies is a Professor in theoretical physics who has published ground-breaking research.

James, William. (1842-1910)
(1902) The Varieties of Religious Experience. Paperback book. Subtitled: “A Study in Human Nature”. 5th (1971 fifth edition) edition. Originally published 1960. From the Gifford Lectures delivered at Edinburgh 1901-1902. Quotes also obtained from Amazon digital Kindle 2015 Xist Publishing edition. Book Review.

Kant, Immanuel. (1724-1804) German philosopher.
(1785) Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. E-book. Amazon Kindle digital edition prepared by David J. Cole prepared by Matthew Stapleton. Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott (1829-1913).

Russell, Bertrand. (1872-1970)
(1946) History of Western Philosophy. Paperback book. 2000 edition. Published by Routledge, London, UK.

Sagan, Carl
(1995) Cosmos. Paperback book. Originally published 1981 by McDonald & Co. Current version published by Abacus.

Stenger, Prof. Victor J.
(2007) God, the Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist. Published by Prometheus Books, NY, USA. Stenger is a Nobel-prize winning physicist, and a skeptical philosopher whose research is strictly rational and evidence-based.

Voltaire. (1694-1778)
(1764) Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary. E-book. Amazon Kindle digital edition produced by Juliet Sutherland, Lisa Riegel and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.

Footnotes

  1. James (1902) digital location 5808-5822. James say that all the arguments used by the faithful for God’s existence ‘prove nothing’ and have faced hundreds of years of solid criticism. Added to this page on 2016 Nov 22.^
  2. Kant (1785) p127.^
  3. Voltaire (1764) p187.^
  4. Stenger (2007) contains a summary of logical arguments.^
  5. Russell (1946) p449.^
  6. Davies (1984) p49.^

Reader Interactions

Comments

  3. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. Nevertheless think of if you added some great pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this website could undeniably be one of the very best in its niche. Fantastic blog!

  5. I’ve read some good stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how so much attempt you set to create any such great informative site.

  7. Hey! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  10. Excellent blog! Do you have any helpful hints for aspiring writers? I’m planning to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you suggest starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m totally confused .. Any recommendations? Many thanks!

  11. Good day! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I truly enjoy reading through your blog posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same subjects? Many thanks!

  12. Have you ever thought about creating an e-book or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e mail.

  13. Thanks foor yur marvelous posting! I eally enjoyed readng it, you
    can bbe a great author.I will ensure that I boikmark our bog and maay come bacxk later in life.
    I want to encourage you to definitely continue
    youhr great posts, havee a nice evening!

  15. Greetings! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I truly enjoy reading through your blog posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same subjects? Thanks a ton!

  18. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% positive. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Appreciate it

  19. Currently it sounds like Expression Engine is the top blogging platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?

  20. Your style is really unique compared to other people I have read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this site.

  27. With havin so much written content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my authorization. Do you know any techniques to help protect against content from being ripped off? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  28. My family members all the time say that I am wasting my time here at net, but I know I am getting familiarity every day by reading such nice articles.

  29. Thank you for some other magnificent article. Where else may just anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect means of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am at the look for such information.

  31. Have you ever thought about creating an e-book or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would enjoy your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.

  33. We stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I may as well check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page for a second time.

  34. Hi my loved one! I want to say that this article is awesome, great written and come with almost all significant infos. I’d like to peer more posts like this .

  37. It’s in reality a nice and helpful piece of information. I’m satisfied that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  39. Whoa! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a entirely different topic but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Excellent choice of colors!

  41. I’m now not sure where you are getting your info, however good topic. I needs to spend a while learning more or working out more. Thank you for wonderful information I used to be on the lookout for this information for my mission.

  47. Nice blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. Bless you

  48. I was very happy to discover this great site. I want to to thank you for your time for this wonderful read!! I definitely loved every bit of it and I have you bookmarked to see new stuff on your web site.

  49. Hey! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I truly enjoy reading through your articles. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same subjects? Thanks!

  50. I am curious to find out what blog system you have been working with? I’m experiencing some minor security problems with my latest site and I would like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any suggestions?

  51. you are in point of fact a just right webmaster. The web site loading velocity is incredible. It sort of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you have performed a great task in this matter!

  53. We stumbled over here from a different web page and thought I might check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to exploring your web page for a second time.

  54. Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is great, let alone the content!

  55. No matter if some one searches for his required thing, thus he/she needs to be available that in detail, so that thing is maintained over here.

  56. I used to be recommended this website by way of my cousin. I am not sure whether this publish is written by way of him as no one else recognise such precise approximately my difficulty. You are amazing! Thank you!

  57. Hey There. I found your blog the use of msn. This is a very well written article. I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thank you for the post. I will definitely comeback.

  58. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and all. Nevertheless think of if you added some great visuals or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this site could undeniably be one of the very best in its niche. Good blog!

  60. I have been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  63. Helpful info. Fortunate me I found your site by accident, and I am surprised why this coincidence did not happened in advance! I bookmarked it.

  64. A person necessarily help to make critically articles I might state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this actual post incredible. Magnificent activity!

  65. It is appropriate time to make a few plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this publish and if I may just I want to recommend you few fascinating things or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read more things approximately it!

  68. Hello, I do believe your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in IE, it has some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Apart from that, wonderful website!

  73. Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back often!

  75. Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the internet the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  83. I don’t know if it’s just me or if everyone else experiencing problems with your website. It appears like some of the text on your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them too? This could be a problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen before. Thanks

  85. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read more things about it!

  86. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my authorization. Do you know any solutions to help reduce content from being ripped off? I’d certainly appreciate it.

  87. Your style is very unique compared to other people I have read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this page.

  90. Онлайн казино радует своих посетителей более чем двумя тысячами увлекательных игр от ведущих разработчиков.

  96. Your style is really unique compared to other people I have read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this web site.

  97. Link exchange is nothing else except it is simply placing the other person’s blog link on your page at appropriate place and other person will also do same in favor of you.

  102. Undeniably believe that that you stated. Your favourite justification appeared to be at the net the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked even as other people consider concerns that they plainly do not understand about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as welland also defined out the whole thing with no need side effect , other folks can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

  103. Pretty section of content. I simply stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to say that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing on your augment or even I fulfillment you get entry to consistently fast.

  104. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?

  105. I am curious to find out what blog system you have been utilizing? I’m experiencing some minor security problems with my latest website and I would like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any suggestions?

  106. Нужна стяжка пола в Москве, но вы не знаете, какой подрядчик лучше выбрать? Обратитесь к нам на сайт styazhka-pola24.ru! Мы предоставляем услуги по устройству стяжки пола любой площади и сложности, а также гарантируем качество и надежность.

  119. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.

  120. Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too great. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a wonderful site.

  122. What i do not realize is if truth be told how you’re not really a lot more smartly-favored than you may be right now. You are so intelligent. You know therefore significantly in relation to this matter, produced me personally believe it from so many various angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated until it’s something to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs excellent. All the time deal with it up!

  128. You’re so cool! I don’t suppose I’ve read anything like this before. So nice to find someone with some unique thoughts on this topic. Really.. thanks for starting this up. This site is something that’s needed on the web, someone with a little originality!

  130. Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  138. Good day! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have done a extraordinary job!

  139. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

  140. I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and engaging, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something which not enough folks are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.

  142. Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really understand what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Please also discuss with my site =). We will have a link exchange contract among us

  143. It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I’m satisfied that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  145. Link exchange is nothing else but it is only placing the other person’s weblog link on your page at appropriate place and other person will also do same in favor of you.

  146. Hi, Neat post. There is a problem with your site in internet explorer, could check this? IE still is the marketplace leader and a large section of other folks will omit your fantastic writing due to this problem.

  150. After checking out a few of the blog articles on your website, I really like your way of blogging. I saved it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back soon. Take a look at my web site as well and let me know what you think.

  153. Does your site have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to send you an e-mail. I’ve got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

  156. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  157. Great goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a wonderful site.

  158. wonderful publish, very informative. I’m wondering why the other experts of this sector do not realize this. You should continue your writing. I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  159. I have been surfing online more than three hours these days, yet I never found any fascinating article like yours. It’s pretty value enough for me. In my opinion, if all site owners and bloggers made just right content as you did, the internet might be much more useful than ever before.

  160. Thank you for some other fantastic article. Where else may anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am at the look for such information.

  162. Pretty portion of content. I simply stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to claim that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing on your augment or even I fulfillment you get right of entry to consistently fast.

  165. Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Very useful information particularly the last part 🙂 I care for such info a lot. I was seeking this particular info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

  167. I do agree with all the ideas you have introduced for your post. They are very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too brief for novices. May you please prolong them a bit from next time? Thank you for the post.

  168. Normally I do not read article on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thank you, quite great article.

  172. I’m not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent information I was looking for this information for my mission.

  174. Magnificent beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  178. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you! By the way, how can we communicate?

  180. Do you have a spam issue on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking to trade solutions with other folks, be sure to shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  184. Howdy! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  185. I do accept as true with all the concepts you have presented for your post. They are very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too brief for newbies. May you please prolong them a bit from next time? Thank you for the post.

  186. Hi there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  187. Greetings from Idaho! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to check out your website on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the knowledge you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, fantastic site!

  188. Thank you for any other informative blog. Where else may just I am getting that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I have a undertaking that I am simply now running on, and I have been at the glance out for such information.

  190. Hello there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  191. Can I just say what a relief to discover somebody who truly knows what they’re talking about on the internet. You certainly understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people should look at this and understand this side of the story. I was surprised that you aren’t more popular since you certainly have the gift.

  192. I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here frequently. I am quite certain I will learn a lot of new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

  193. I’m not sure why but this website is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  194. Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice at the same time as you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a applicable deal. I were tiny bit familiar of this your broadcast provided bright transparent concept

  197. Доверьте оштукатуривание стен профессионалам с сайта mehanizirovannaya-shtukaturka-moscow.ru. Экономьте свое время и силы!

  200. It’s actually a nice and helpful piece of information. I’m glad that you shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  255. I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  266. Excellent website you have here but I was wanting to know if you knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really love to be a part of online community where I can get responses from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Appreciate it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *